The US Airways Flight 1549 Election (You're perfectly right)
This is your captain speakingIt's odd, considering the amount of time people spend on airplanes (especially pop stars), that there are not more songs written on the subject of flight. Most of them suck but there are a few good ones which I'll list in no particular order:
This is your captain speaking
To tell you I'm out of my brain again
This is your captain speaking
And if you think I'm freaking
You're perfectly right
And I'd be delighted if any of you could give us a hand
And land the plane.
- "Eight Miles High" - The Byrds
- "San Antonio, TX" - Frank Black
- "This Time Tomorrow" - The Kinks
The song speaks to the feeling of absolute helplessness air travelers experience when they're strapped into their seats and being piloted by an insane captain who's asking for their help to land the plane - or worse, telling them to brace for impact into a sky scraper or remote rural patch of dirt. The sort of thing one contemplates on 9/11 or when reading "The Flight 93 Election" an essay that's been roiling the "conservative" websphere for the past week with its stark indictment of #NeverTrump specifically and the conservative movement generally. I'm not going to cherry pick a bunch of paragraphs from the piece and comment because the whole thing should be read in its entirety = it really does make a powerful and unified argument but there is one paragraph that hits the bulls-eye:
"Let’s be very blunt here: if you genuinely think things can go on with no fundamental change needed, then you have implicitly admitted that conservatism is wrong. Wrong philosophically, wrong on human nature, wrong on the nature of politics, and wrong in its policy prescriptions. Because, first, few of those prescriptions are in force today. Second, of the ones that are, the left is busy undoing them, often with conservative assistance. And, third, the whole trend of the West is ever-leftward, ever further away from what we all understand as conservatism."This is a point the KOTCB blog has been making repeatedly over the past 18 months:
- The gullibility of normal politics
- Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war
- Jonass buys his ticket to Tarshish
- Nelson Chaney washes his hands
- incompetent at governing and unwilling to be governed
- Rip its heart out
- Mission Accomplished
- His Saturn in Cancer
No one reads the Keeper of the Clown Bell, but everyone reads the CRB and boy are they pissed.
- National Review Cheer Up, Conservatives: We’re Not Stuck on Flight 93
- The Heritage Foundation This Isn’t The Flight 93 Election, It’s The MH370 Election
- Powerline THE FLIGHT 93 ELECTION?
- Red State No This Is NOT The ‘Flight 93 Election’, Rush
- The Daily Wire The Widely-Praised 'Flight 93 Election' Essay Is Dishonest And Stupid
It’s also not true. Truth would exonerate him. But it isn’t true — and even if it were, he can’t possibly know that it is. I am the first to concede that if Hillary Clinton wins it will likely be terrible for the country. But America is larger than one election for one office in one branch in one of our many layers of government. Indeed, if it’s true that America is one election away from death, then America is already dead. Because the whole idea of this country is that most of life exists outside of the scope of government. Yes, this idea is battered and bloodied. But I fail to see how rejecting the idea — as Publius does — is the best way to save it.And this, dear reader, is the fundamental disconnect that the Alt-Right is illuminating for the conservative pundit class. America is already dead if "the whole idea of this country is that most of life exists outside of the scope of government" because this idea is not just "battered and bloodied" - it's none existent. The left certainly doesn't recognize this "idea" as legitimate and, when you get right down to the "blunt" reality of our politics, the right (NatReview, WSJ, etc.), while recognizing it, can hardly make it out and doesn't believe what it sees as legitimate either. "Even if it were" true - "it's also not true."
What, for the love of God, "exists outside the scope of government" in the USA circa 2016? A subject of the administrative state can't wipe his ass without government being involved in every aspect of the act - controlling the food supply, taxing the food, taxing (and regulating) the toilet and the toilet paper, rationing the water, processing the waist and recycling the gray water, even telling you who you have to share the bathroom with. This has all happened with the help of the conservative movement who play to lose with honor, but lose all the same. And by this point they will even admit that they've lost - admit the concept into their mind - but they can not or will not believe it. There is a big difference between admitting something and believing something and in that opaque journey is a flight path to sanity.