Skip to main content

Merrickocracy

According to Amy Davidson of The New Yorker:
"There were several ghosts present at the ceremony on Tuesday night, in the East Room of the White House, at which President Donald Trump introduced Judge Neil Gorsuch, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, as his nominee for Supreme Court Justice. Some were mentioned and others ignored, but all together they gave the event an unsettled air. The President didn’t seem to notice." 
And the reason that the POTUS was oblivious to the haunting doesn't get revealed until the last paragraph of the article, but when it does you sort of say to yourself, "I should have seen this coming."
"The Republicans, after all, were able to keep this seat open for close to a year by refusing even to acknowledge President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland, whose credentials are no less impressive than those of Gorsuch. Trump did not mention Garland on Tuesday night, as he led Gorsuch to the seat that Garland should have filled, on a Court that will, for a long time, be haunted by his absence."
"Hello... hello... is that Samuel Rosenman I hear talking?"

Ah, "The False Promise of Meritocracy" and all that it implies for our nation and its civic leadership.
"The paradox of meritocracy builds on other research showing that those who think they are the most objective can actually exhibit the most bias in their evaluations. When people think they are objective and unbiased then they don’t monitor and scrutinize their own behavior. They just assume that they are right and that their assessments are accurate."
So "when the GOP stole Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court seat, they set the stage for a miserable battle" and "in fact, the U.S. Senate should refuse to confirm anyone President Trump nominates to the Supreme Court—until Trump renominates and the Senate confirms Judge Merrick Garland." So claim the most objective mediums at the seance, but I fear they might be missing an even bigger specter in this tale of terror. For while it's true that justice Garland was qualified with a stellar resume and broad experience the true problem of meritocracy is the inherit limits a striver is burdened with by THE ONE who bestows the awarded "merit" so sought after and cherished on the assent to the summit. It was president Obama who suffered the contempt of the Senate - not Merrick Garland and this fact had been made perfectly clear to BHO well before he announced his nominee to fill Nino's suddenly (mysteriously) empty seat.
“I hope they’re fair,” the president said of Senate Republicans during his Rose Garden announcement. “That’s all. I hope they are fair.”
You're goddamn right!
This is for the deciding vote on the Supreme Court you jackass and the GOP told you the day after Scalia's passing that they were not going to confirm any SCOTUS appointments before November 8th - period. And you think it's "fair" to drag poor old Merrick Garland into the White House Rose Garden and nominate him for a job he's never going to get. Just hang him out to dry like some white shirt on the line with all your other dirty laundry. Because if Trump gets elected he will not get confirmed and if Hitlery gets elected HE ALSO WILL NOT GET CONFIRMED. Sure, MitchMc might have tried to push him through hearings in the lame duck session but Crying Chuck would have filibustered claiming that the new POTUS deserves Her own choice. So the question springs to mind - what kind of "judge" is willing to throw his career, reputation and dignity on the pyre of liberal vanity to advance the interest of the Democrat party? (We're talking about human sacrifice here, after all).

An apparatchik 'mensch' draped in a black robe, that's what kind of judge Merrick Garland is and he's more than willing to take a (metaphorical) bullet for his side. Married to the daughter of Samuel I. Rosenman with a home base of Bethesda, MD and a seat on the D.C. court of appeals this guy is a New Deal centralized power "Progressive" interpreter of the living constitution if there ever was one and whatever circumspection he's shown in lower court rulings is only a stratagem to win confirmation to the high court where he would promptly jump the traces of constitutional limits and pull up a chair around the Ouija board with his colleagues and make shit up as they receive it from the world beyond. Hey, that's fine, RGB and KKKagan are part of the same cult, but I don't buy into this concept of a "stolen seat" or that there was anyone on either side of the political isle, including the POTUS - including the nominee!!! who thought there was a pure white snowballs chance in hell of Merrick Garland ever getting confirmed as a Justice on the SCOTUS.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Story with Gretchen Carlson

She was "sexy", but "too much hard work."

I'm a regular Fox & Friends viewer (mostly in protest of the other insipid morning programs like Today and Good Morning America) so over the years I've gotten to know Gretchen Carlson pretty well. Stuck between Steve and Brian she always seemed a prudish scold with an irritating, self-righteous demeanor that I simply put up with because I figured some people in the Fox audience actually liked her persona. It was obvious that Steve and Brian did not, but they were stuck with her like so many talking heads and had to make the best of it - which they did. Besides, she was no worse than any of the other women on morning show TV - I mean, you're only going to find a certain kind of person to do this kind of work and that kind of person is the Gretchen Carlson kind. Then, one day, she was gone and replaced by Elisabeth Hasselbeck and the F&F ratings began to climb, and climb and climb - in two months viewershi…

The Democracy Quirk

Let it be said that Politico is one of the most worthless web sites with clout on the internet - it's like the Washington Post after a night of hard drinking in the Georgetown bars that passed out on a friends couch. Predictable and stupid at the same time - Also, the editors appear to despise democracy as a political science and as practiced here in the USA. Their latest "explanation" for the Trump phenomenon takes aim at the voters and their knowing ignorance which can be easily explained by the Dunning-Kruger Effect. The article written by shrink/educator David Dunning illuminates a big, glaring problem in any democracy, and that is, "we all run the risk of being too ill-informed to notice when our own favored candidates or national leaders make catastrophic misjudgments." Shit, now you tell us, for surely this is not a problem unique to 2016 and probably was in effect in 2000 and 1980 and 1968 and so on...
But as a psychologist who has studied human behavi…

Running Fence 2

You probably know that the Congress (specifically the Senate) and the POTUS are at loggerheads over Federal funding for the Big Beautiful Wall to be built along the US southern boarder. The reasons for this impasse are long and complex so a quick review of how we got here might be in order.

The Elvis from Queens glided down the escalator at Trump Tower (corner of 57th & 5th) and declared to America and the World that he intended to build A Great Wall across the southern boarder when he became POTUS because this alternate speech was never going to happen (KOTCB Alternate Universe 06/15/2015)A few weeks later candidate Trump was presented with a big fat brick of pain and suffering that served as the cornerstone of his campaign (KOTCB Dirty Sanchez)The physical Wall served as a curative slap in the face of the DC establishment who had, over the years, constructed an elaborate Folly Wall in place of the real thing (KOTCB Decius drops the mic)The idea of the Big Beautiful Wall began to…