Skip to main content

The Democracy Quirk

Let it be said that Politico is one of the most worthless web sites with clout on the internet - it's like the Washington Post after a night of hard drinking in the Georgetown bars that passed out on a friends couch. Predictable and stupid at the same time - Also, the editors appear to despise democracy as a political science and as practiced here in the USA. Their latest "explanation" for the Trump phenomenon takes aim at the voters and their knowing ignorance which can be easily explained by the Dunning-Kruger Effect. The article written by shrink/educator David Dunning illuminates a big, glaring problem in any democracy, and that is, "we all run the risk of being too ill-informed to notice when our own favored candidates or national leaders make catastrophic misjudgments." Shit, now you tell us, for surely this is not a problem unique to 2016 and probably was in effect in 2000 and 1980 and 1968 and so on...
But as a psychologist who has studied human behavior—including voter behavior—for decades, I think there is something deeper going on. The problem isn’t that voters are too uninformed. It is that they don’t know just how uninformed they are.
This cognitive bias (a pernicious from of false-concousness) needs to be addressed and maybe it's the reason president Obama signed his Executive Order -- Using Behavioral Science Insights to Better Serve the American People last fall because the American People need behavioral science to lead them to a golden future - one they're too close minded and self-assured to even realize exists. It makes you wonder how we've managed for all these centuries using the old system of simple voting to choose our elected representatives? Though the voters might be un-informed, ill-informed or over-informed the blind spots in their overall knowledge never get completely filled in so they make dangerous choices but we live with it and go on about our lives as best we can.

I for one am a big believer in democracy and my trust in the democratic process has grown over the years through hard (sometimes devastating) experience. I'll give you a good for instance: In the 2012 election I supported Mitt Romney for president over Barack Obama. I had nothing against Obama personally and always kind of liked him - especially the way he took out HRC in the Dem primary of '08 and assumed the burden (if you can call it that) of FBPOTUS. But I thought the DC centric policy and regulation heavy administrative state was a job killer and the entire ethos of his practical presidency was warmed over New Deal/Great Society dog vomit. Romney was not my preferred candidate with his nerdy money man persona and weird religion but, hey,  I sucked it up like millions of republicans and pulled the leaver for Wilber, er, Willard. Romney lost and, whoops, there goes the republic, right? Wrong. How very, very wrong I was did not become apparent until years later when Mitt Romney pulled this stunt:


I did not know the man I voted for but I voted for him anyway and now I thank God for all the Obama voters who overruled my choice. I am a knowledgeable, well informed voter but I made the same mistake that millions of other voters made that year and though I was disappointed on the first Tuesday in November 2012 I am elated now. Who could have known that this turncoat would implode with indignant rage over a GOP candidate who hadn't even won the nomination but was in the middle of a fight with the best and brightest of the party. "Improvident choices" are the only choices we have and the only choices we will ever have. Onward, into the abyss.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Story with Gretchen Carlson

She was "sexy", but "too much hard work." I'm a regular Fox & Friends viewer (mostly in protest of the other insipid morning programs like Today and Good Morning America) so over the years I've gotten to know Gretchen Carlson pretty well. Stuck between Steve and Brian she always seemed a prudish scold with an irritating, self-righteous demeanor that I simply put up with because I figured some people in the Fox audience actually liked her persona. It was obvious that Steve and Brian did not, but they were stuck with her like so many talking heads and had to make the best of it - which they did. Besides, she was no worse than any of the other women on morning show TV - I mean, you're only going to find a certain kind of person to do this kind of work and that kind of person is the Gretchen Carlson kind. Then, one day, she was gone and replaced by Elisabeth Hasselbeck and the F&F ratings began to climb, and climb and climb - in two months view

The Pop-Tarts Bowl: Frauds v. Fakers

In the Techno-Fascist Imperium the "Holidays" festivities start on Columbus Day, when the Halloween candy pops up, and end New Years Day with college football Bowl games, black-eyed peas and collard greens. To be clear, the Imperium doesn't celebrate Columbus Day, au contraire, the Indigenous Peoples' Day psyop has been pushed hard by the IC for the past 50 years of failure but the candy... THE CANDY. This year's IPD got turned up to eleven when the colonizers of America's 51st state got kidnapped, raped and murdered by some indigenous maniacs on Sukkot 10/7 and, as a result, soured the festive '23 Holiday mood. Hey, we soldiered on, as it were, and kept on celebrating while the world burned: Halloween - Big for children and weirdos. Thanksgiving - Focus on God, country and family. Hannukkah - Jewish assimilation. Xmas - Santa Claus and gifts. Kwanzaa - Black Lives Matter. I'd call them Happy Holidays if it wasn't  a neo-Nazi dog whistle  to vocal

Lose This Skin Mika

I've been tempted to post something on the KOTCB blog since the day the Elvis from Queens tweeted about Mika's bleeding face and the ensuing media meltdown flooded the broadcast airways and Internet with gunk. But every frigg'n day @POTUS lets loose another tweet or 2 that usurps whatever I was going to say the day before so I've just been waiting and watching and loving every minute of it. With Sunday's napalm strike he might have finally brought them to their knees - but there's always tomorrow. The latest tweet was immediately condemned by journalists, who said Trump seemed to be promoting physical violence against the media, while a Republican lawmaker said the president was trying to "weaponize distrust" through his postings. "Promoting physical violence" or a tactic to "weaponize distrust" don't explain it folks - this is total war waged by a pachyderm with old, scared hide who's been beaten and whipped for so